Categorized | Featured, Reviews

Review: Avatar

Genre:  Action/ Adventure/ Sci-Fi / Thriller

Director: James Cameron

Writer: James Cameron

Cast: Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldana, Sigourney Weaver, Stephen Lang, Michelle Rodriguez, Giovanni Ribisi, Joel Moore, CCH Pounder, Wes Studi

MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for intense epic battle sequences and warfare, sensuality, language)

Summary: In the future, Jake, a paraplegic war veteran, is brought to another planet, Pandora, which is inhabited by the Na’vi, a humanoid race with their own language and culture. Those from Earth find themselves at odds with each other and the local culture.

Run Time:  162 minutes

View the Trailer HERE

[This Review Contains Spoilers]

These days when money is tight, you have to pick and choose carefully what you spend your hard-earned cash on. With all the hype surrounding this flick you’d think that it’s a no-brainer. After all, “Avatar” is winning awards even before it comes out, so it must be good, right? This is exactly why you should read this review before you head out to the theaters and spend nearly twice as much (or more if you’re set on seeing it in the IMAX theater) as you would for a regular movie ticket for this 3D film.

James Cameron’s “Avatar” is spun with great hype for the technological advances this film has made for the film industry. It created and utilized the new tech of motion capture to integrate actors’ performances into an animated characters and created a whole entire world, rich with flora and fauna in 3D. That said, let’s first talk about this film as a storyline and characters before launching into the technical aspects of “Avatar”.

The story of “Avatar” follows Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), a crippled war vet who takes over his twin brother’s slot in an experimental program where scientists plug in and operate “avatars”which are ten-foot tall, blue, hybrid bodies made from the scientist’s own DNA combined with the DNA of the native Na’vi population. The scientists’ goal, of course, clashes with the private sector goal on this primal moon, called Pandora. The politically-correct plan was to use these avatars to learn the natives’ culture and what they know about the planet’s flora and to better negotiate a relocation of the native people away from the site of interest. Jake is accepted into the native population and learns their ways with the orders to report back on weaknesses and best plans of attack. Instead of allowing the natives to be destroyed, Jake goes ‘native’ and sides with the native Na’vi people. So yes, the plot is indeed very “Dances With Wolves”.

The plot-line and dialogue of this film seems forced and even corny at times.  It felt like a screwdriver was used to force the plot to fit to Cameron’s purposes. Audience members at the screening I attended even laughed at dramatic parts of the movie because it was so bad! There are also serious plot holes like “Does Jake not rest at all?” Because when his avatar is sleeping, he is up and active in his human body and then he has to go back to do a full day in his avatar right after! There were times in the movie where I did have the eye-rolling reaction- mostly where long monologues were inserted to make up for lack of quality story-telling!

The Na’vi people are interesting and engaging enough, but they themselves cannot sell the film! Sam Worthington’s Jake Sully was good enough to move the plot forward. Sigourney Weaver’s head scientist character and Michelle Rodriguez’s pilot character were strong enough to form an awkward balance between the strong female characters on human and alien sides (Zoe Saldana and CCH Pounder play the roles of the princess and sha-woman of the tribe).  The actors’ performances were severely restricted by the lack of a strong script. Seriously, a guy in my row literally fell asleep and snored for about a half hour in the middle of the film.

But wait! Zoe Saldana’s character, Neytiri, the Na’vi princess and Jake’s love interest, is the shining star of the film. Her performance almost saves the entirety of this crap-tastic storyline. Neytiri is the most fleshed out character of the film and you can really feel her and relate to her. She makes the existence and culture of the Na’vi feel real and vibrant! Cameron should pay Saldana more for saving his ass on this film.

The story of “Avatar” itself is not good enough to see in a 3D treatment, but the animated world of Pandora , created for this film is indeed amazing and more worthy of this high-priced viewing. The 3D of this film is not the gimmicky look-at-this-ax-flying-at-your-head sort of 3D, but rather it is used as a way of enhancing the depth and detail of the visual environment. There was one scene in particular that was breath-taking- the scene with the seeds of the sacred tree dancing in the air around Jake and Neytiri. I admire the film for the creation of an incredibly rich world history, culture, mythos, and interesting creature designs. The flora is very marine-life inspired and that in itself is delightful to see how the creative team behind Pandora adapted these inspirations to a new world of flora.

Now, the rendered landscapes elicited a mixed reaction from me. On the one hand, it is difficult to light a rendered environment in a realistic fashion in harsh and bright light, so I suppose that I give them an “E” for effort on that aspect since I felt that the landscapes and built environments had a video-game-like feel to them. There also seemed to be a haze on top of everything outside to perhaps blur out imperfections? A complaint on the look of the fauna – the textures on the animals felt too uniform, like they were all of a similar painted vinyl fabric texture or something resembling a Fruit-Roll-Up.

One thing that Cameron does well as always is the tech dreamt up for these futuristic contexts. The Command and Control Center of the base on Pandora, mech body suits used in the field, aircraft, and avatar pods were designed in a believable and near-future fashion.

The technological advancements mentioned earlier in this review include new motion-capture tech to capture every eye movement and minute facial expression of the actors. This was supposed to make the animated characters appear even more life-like. I thought it was well done, but even this tech did not break through the wall of believability to me. Perhaps that fact that these characters were blue with tails and that I am not used to seeing that type of alien kept me from believing them as true creatures!

A good deal of the film is a combination of rendered environments melded with live action footage. This melding is done in such a way that it is hard to tell which is which. This is both good and bad at the same time because it still looked odd to me. I cannot tell if it was odd lighting or perhaps the too-perfect textures in both live-action and rendered footage, but something was wrong. It’s like being trapped in the narrow valley between what is real and what is not in a way that leaves you on the side of disbelief.

Here’s the bottom line: You cannot deny the technological achievements of this film, but as a film, “Avatar” suffers from a predictable and labored plotline. This film is more of a high-tech spectacle than anything else, save Zoe Saldana’s character. Go see it at a matinee price if you can!

When I was leaving the theater, no one gushed about how great of a movie it was. I think it was more like “OMG, I just spent how much on seeing that? I’m keeping my damn 3D glasses!”

On a side note, if you wear eye-glasses, I have a piece of advice for you. The 3D glasses that you can put over your glasses are a bit awkward and mine tended to slip off my frames through the entire latter half of the film if I wasn’t holding my head just right. I’d advise wearing contacts or to bring some tape to adhere those things onto your glasses!

Also, audience beware, this film seems to have drawn all types of people to it!  There was a whole group of non-geek people in my row that literally talked through the entire movie.

One last note: Unobtanium? Seriously? I can’t tell if this is a nod to geek language or because Cameron was lazy!

I give “Avatar” Two Out Of Five Stars

Share/Bookmark

10 Comments

  1. Wyatt says:

    OMG you have no idea how much I appreciated this review. All my friends where so impressed with the visuals that no one could even see that the movie itself was par at best. The movie looked amazing, but that was really all it had going. The alien world was basically a rain forest in technicolor with a couple extra legs. OH and it was basically the plot of Tom Cruise’s The Last Samurai.

    Also…Unobtanium bugged me too…what a lame name.

  2. filmgurl says:

    Nice review! I like how you describe the plot like, “Dances With Wolves.” It was very much an aesthetic kind of film. Great tips especially for those with eyeglasses, thanks for sharing!

  3. thepicklebot says:

    I think two stars is harsh, although I agree with practically everything you said – Unobtanium and Worthington’s lack of sleep irritated me no end – but I felt there was enough to capture my interest through the overlong running time, and the characters managed to distract me from the ridiculously hackneyed plot.

    I would say three stars. I saw it in 2D and want to see it in 3D, but do not know if I can cope with the hours of nothing happening again!

  4. Unobtanium is the actual scientific term researchers use for a game changing resource that hasn’t been named yet. Cameron did a lot of research and the name is completely accurate.

    Also, this review seems entirely too affected by the audience you saw it with! No one laughed at a single dramatic scene in my theater, no one fell asleep, no one talked, and everyone was on cloud 9 when they left. Every audience is different and you shouldn’t let yourself be affected by that when reviewing a film.

    Having said all that, of course the dialogue is corny and the plot is fairly standard. Its james cameron. Was anyone expecting anything different? But it still involved me and enthralled me. It requires a shitload of suspension of disbelief, but I love it when movies require that. if it didn’t hit you, it didn’t hit you, I’m just interested in some criticism about this film that isn’t just discussing things we all knew before we ever even saw the movie.

    But thanks for writing this! Love to see fellow female geeks writing their opinions, even if I disagree :)

    • Dave says:

      You’re right about Unobtainium, however.. it’s been over used in Sci-Fi movies (even crappy ones like THE CORE) and you’d think all the effort Cameron put into building this Universe, he could’ve come up with something original.

      I’ve got to say that it’s fairly presumptuous (not to mention insulting) of you to think that simply because her theater had a different audience than yours did, that she must have been weak minded and have been affected by that in order to give the film such a bad review.

      and… I love how NOW that everyone has seen the movie, they’re making excuses like “well.. yeah, we knew the story was weak and the dialogue would be corny beforehand, so it’s ok that we like it anyway because it’s visually enthralling” ?!?

      Really, so – we’re able to lower the bar for James ‘King of the World’ Cameron for some reason.. but everyone will gladly bash the living daylights out of every single ‘all sizzle, no steak’ visual spectacle that Michael Bay creates? Is that simply because Cameron is so much more high-brow and classy than Bay?

      Ya know, classy like calling himself the HMFIC on the set of every movie… Bay and Cameron are one in the same, don’t kid yourself and don’t try to excuse Avatar’s overall sh!t factor so that you don’t have to feel like a moron for anticipating it, as so many people did for the exact same reason after the awfulness that was ‘The Phantom Menace’ (myself included).

      Just admit it was crap, don’t tell your friends to waste hard earned money on said crap and get on with your life, it’s just a movie.

      • Oh dude, don’t get me wrong, I am not a Cameron worshipper. I despise Jim Cameron and have since I was 11 years old. I went into this movie thinking I would hate it. My expectations were very low and I had a strong pre-bias against it.

        The thing is, everyone is saying that – “why should it get away with a weak story just because the visuals are strong?” but for me, despite the occasional corny line here or there, I didn’t have those problems with the movie. I was immersed, I was affected, I was enthralled, I was moved. And that isn’t achieved simply with great visuals. His storytelling somehow worked for me, someone who has been talking about how overrated this movie would be from the moment it was announced. I hated The Phantom Menace because I LOVE Star Wars and TPM failed on every level. Avatar did not and people overall are not giving it enough credit, hating to hate. I don’t think this review is doing that at all, just seems that with 3 references to the audience, there may be an influence there. Doesn’t mean I don’t respect this review or Lillian’s opinion.

        And let’s not forget that these visuals people seem to oddly dismiss so quickly are groundbreaking and beautiful and require a shitload of artistry. Jim Cameron happens to be an egomaniac who likes to tell stories – sometimes he gets it right (Terminator movies, Aliens), sometimes he doesn’t (Titanic, blech), but he still achieved something pretty fucking amazing here, even if the dialogue leaves slightly more to be desired. People are overstating their hatred of this movie and going out of their way to insult precisely because it is Jim Cameron. If any other director had made this movie, people would not be hating on it as much. But with another director, it would not be the ground-breaking, stunning, immersive experience it is, if it even existed at all.

    • I am aware that unobtanium is a real term and it was correctly used, though it just seemed lazy, writing-wise.

      The reactions of others do not inform mine. In this case, they supported my thoughts on the film. Heck, I was the one with the strong eye-rolls! I added the audience reaction to give that level of dimension to this review since it is an extremely hyped film.

      This one really didn’t engage me enough. I have got to give them points for the culture and world creation, but the story and horrible dialogue didn’t hold up to the hype. You need a strong story to carry a quality film. Zoe Saldana was the strength of this movie, but she couldn’t save the entire film!

      The technological advances are not to be denied in this film, but it’s not enough to make this a good film!

      Thanks for reading and commenting! Female geeks are not a myth! LOL!

Leave a Comment

Mafia Member Blogs Visit »

Why Wizards Rule Them All

Sunday, January 10th
by Melanie Ong

Super Megafest 2009

Thursday, November 26th
by Jessa Phillips

Paranormal Activity - Movie Review

Saturday, November 21st
by Jessa Phillips

Heads up, Dallas people- STAR WARS IN CONCERT! Discount tickets!

Thursday, October 15th
by Lillian S. aka 'zenbitch'

Yo! It's my Annual Halloween Pub Crawl!

Tuesday, October 6th
by Lillian S. aka 'zenbitch'

It's October 1st. Bring on the Halloween.

Thursday, October 1st
by Mike T

Pandorum - Movie Review

Monday, September 28th
by Jessa Phillips

Dragon*Con 2009 – Day 1

Saturday, September 26th
by Jessa Phillips